Tuesday, July 31, 2012

There is No Colusion Between Executive and Judicial... Right?

 Federal Court Finds Obama Appointees Interfered With New Black Panther Prosecution

Wow... Imagine that?

Obama’s DOJ had claimed Judicial Watch was not entitled to attorney’s fees since “none of the records produced in this litigation evidenced any political interference whatsoever in” how the DOJ handled the New Black Panther Party case. But United States District Court Judge Reggie Walton disagreed. Citing a “series of emails” between Obama political appointees and career Justice lawyers, Walton writes:
The documents reveal that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJ’s dismissal of claims in that case, which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General Perez’s testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision. Surely the public has an interest in documents that cast doubt on the accuracy of government officials’ representations regarding the possible politicization of agency decision-making.

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

The Raptor takes down Al Qaeda websites

Watching out for his child and the rest of the Americans currently in harms way, this Grandpa is doing his part in the war on terror. #military #hactivism #hacker

Read more: Grandpa, patriot who goes by 'The Raptor,' claims credit for taking down Al Qaeda websites

Sunday, March 18, 2012

Medicare Reform Plan

Medicare Reform Plan will allow all Medicare recipients the same Healthcare Plan as Congress. Sen. Rand Paul sponsors a previous John Kerry plan.






Saturday, February 4, 2012

Final Decision - Georgia Ballot Challenge - 2/3/2012

An ill prepared case killed the opportunity to prove if Obama is actually ineligible to hold the office of POTUS.

A wasted opportunity...

Excerpt from the full Court Ruling below:


The Court finds the testimony of the witnesses, as well as the exhibits tendered, to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support Plaintiffs' allegations.

Ms. Taitz attempted to solicit expert testimony from several of the witnesses without qualifying or tendering the witnesses as experts. See Stephens v. State, 219 Ga. App. 881 (1996) (the unqualified testimony of the witness was not competent evidence). For example, two of Plaintiffs' witnesses testified that Mr. Obama's birth certificate was forged, but neither witness was properly qualified or tendered as an expert in birth records, forged documents or document manipulation. Another witness testified that she has concluded that the social security number Mr. Obama uses is fraudulent;however, her investigatory methods and her sources of information were not properly presented, and she was never qualified or tendered as an expert in social security fraud, or fraud investigations in general. Accordingly, the Court cannot make an objective threshold determination of these witnesses' testimony without adequate knowledge of their qualifications. See Knudsen v. Duffee-Freeman, Inc., 95 Ga. App. 872 (1957) (forthe testimony of an expert witness to be received, his or her qualifications as such must
be first proved).

None of the testifying witnesses provided persuasive testimony. Moreover, theCourt finds that none of the written submissions tendered by Plaintiffs have probative value. Given the unsatisfactory evidence presented by the Plaintiffs, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs' claims are not persuasive.

Friday, January 20, 2012

70% of American Voters Disagree With Obama – Favor Increased Access to Oil and Gas Resources











It would seem Americans want some domestic drilling... Open domestic resources up to the American consumers. American Resources belong to the American people... Not to the federal government.

The people of the United States are tired of having to suffer because of corporate cronyism and government collusion all in the name of the almighty dollar. Or should I say fascism...

Gas Buddy

70% of American voters disagree with Barack Obama and favor increased access to oil and gas resources.
API.org reported:

Seventy percent of American voters favor increased access to U.S. oil and natural gas resources, and similar numbers believe more oil and natural gas development would provide major benefits to the nation, including more U.S. jobs, according to a new poll released today.

“Voters know developing more of America’s homegrown energy makes sense for our economy and our energy security,” said API President and CEO Jack Gerard. “Our economy will demand large amounts of oil and natural gas for at least several more decades even as the role of alternative energy increases. Common sense says we should have Americans producing that oil and gas here at home as much as possible.”

The recent API telephone poll, conducted by Harris Interactive, among 1,005 registered voters found that large majorities believe that more U.S. oil and natural gas development could lead to more American jobs (87 percent), help the U.S. economy and reduce consumer energy costs (83 percent), increase the nation’s energy security (82 percent), and deliver more revenue to the government (72 percent). Over two-thirds (70 percent) believe that some in Washington are intentionally delaying domestic oil and natural gas development, potentially hurting the economy and leading to higher energy costs for consumers.

Nebraska’s Republican Gov. Dave Heineman told The Politico Obama made a mistake by rejecting the Keystone Pipeline.

Monday, January 16, 2012

SOPA stalls in the face of White House opposition

(January 16 2012) The Stop Online Piracy Act hit a wall over the weekend after The White House came out against the bill. The Hill reports on comments from house oversight chairman Darrell Issa, who was assured by majority leader Eric Cantor that more work was needed “to address outstanding concerns and work to build consensus prior to any anti-piracy legislation coming before the House for a vote.”

Shortly before that statement, SOPA sponsor chairman Lamar Smith offered to make significant concessions to the section of the bill that would require ISPs to block offending sites, but it wasn’t enough. SOPA’s Senate counterpart, the Protect IP Act, is still on the table, however.


Read More: SOPA stalls in the face of White House opposition


Thursday, January 5, 2012

Marching Towards Dictatorship? NDAA and now Executive Priviliged Constitutionality

It appears our leaders in Washington are making no secret of their plans to virtually enslave us to their will. Un-Constitutional laws, bills and events such as NDAA and indefinite detention, SOPA and internet censorship, Police / Military crackdowns on public dissent and H.R. 3166 – Enemy Expatriation Act, are being reported or discovered daily and all stamp on our natural rights.

H.R.3166
Latest Title: Enemy Expatriation Act
Sponsor: Rep Dent, Charles W. [PA-15] (introduced 10/12/2011) Cosponsors (3)
Related Bills: S.1698
Latest Major Action: 10/24/2011 Referred to House subcommittee.
Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement.

President Obama has taken it upon himself to take advantage of the Congressional holiday recess and make four administrative appointments, thus bypassing the usual confirmation hearings for the time being. Add to that our Commander in Chief has found it appropriate to let Congress know that he has the final word what power the Executive Branch can wield.

I have advised Congress that I will not construe these provisions as preventing me from fulfilling my constitutional responsibility to recommend to the Congress’s consideration such measures as I shall judge necessary and expedient.

Read more: Obama to Congress: I’ll decide what’s constitutional


Saturday, December 31, 2011

Obama's Last Act of 2011 - NDAA

From Hawaii, President Obama signed the NDAA of 2012 into Law

It is being reported that Obama has issues with some of the clauses and wording, but the motives for the issues are up for interpretation. You can read his statement on the White House website.

One official explained that President Obama does believe, however, that American citizens can be temporarily detained, and that the military has the right to capture and hold any citizen who is engaged in conflict against the United States. If various provisions in the law prove unworkable, the president could go back to Congress to ask for changes.

“The president is going to adhere to the policies that he has held over the last three years, making sure that none of these congressional provisions impede the ability of the counterterrorism and military professional from keeping the country safe,” the official said.

The story on ABCs website: With Reservations, Obama Signs Act to Allow Detention of Citizens

Sunday, December 11, 2011

Oath Keepers Retract Mormon Food Storage Post - Source Denies Story


TheEagleKeeper December 11, 2011 at 6:43 PM

This is just a bit of information to chew on. Oath Keepers is a reputable organization of active duty military and law enforcement, as well as military veterans and firefighters, who have stood up to say they will not deny their oath to the Constitution, and to the American people.

These folks are truly Liberty and Freedom’s Allies and stand for what this country was founded on.

With that said, there can be individuals in any group who are crackpots or even willfully make an organization look bad after joining it.. just to discredit and divert it from the mission.

If you own a handgun, and you had issues with the Brady Bill when it was first implemented by Reno and the Clinton administration, you will remember the law was challenged all the way up to the supreme court. The Sheriff who called the government to account and said they were encroaching on States rights by forcing them to invoke the Brady Law was Sheriff Richard Mack.

Sheriff Richard Mack is on the Board of Directors of the Oath Keepers.

It is not a crackpot organization, and it deserves respect as a strong member of the Liberty Movement and the movements to stop federal constitutional encroachments.

For Liberty


Klapton December 11, 2011 at 8:36 PM

The story has been retracted, and Oath Keepers will NOT be embarassed this way again.

http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2011/12/09/1oath-keepers-alert-federal-agents-demand-customer-lists-from-mormon-food-storage-facility/

“We have pulled this story about the Mormon cannery being visited by federal agents because the source of the information at the cannery is now denying that he ever told us that event occurred.

From now on, we will NOT post any such story based on what we are told by other people unless, and until, they are willing to go on video or at least on an audio recording with their info. That way, in case someone starts to crumble under the public attention or other pressures, and wants to deny what they told us, we have video or audio proof.

We get all kinds of scary intel, all the time, and we rarely pass it on because we don’t have confirming documentation. In this case, we were relying on a confirmed eye witness who is now denying it. We will not do that again without a recording.”

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Glenn Beck - Current Events & Politics - List of Obama's Czars

In case anyone is interested in who the CZARS are, Beck has put a list together. There are only 32 listed so I don't think this is all off them as I believe the last count was 44.

They answer only to the Executive Branch.


Glenn Beck - Current Events & Politics - List of Obama's Czars

Shared via AddThis

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Internal RNC Memo: "Engage In Every Activity" To Slow Down Health Care Reform


Of Course the Dems, Liberals and Statists would have no idea what the Viet Cong playbook is. Communist, socialist ideologies are what the Statists stands for. Those who support this ideology support power to the state, and none to the people.



You folks better wake up before you give your country away.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Monday, July 20, 2009

RI Tea Party says it can march again in July 4 parade

The Independence day Parade organizing committee has lifted the "ban for life" imposed on the Rhode Island Tea Party.The decision was made after it could not be proven that the Tea Party had actually passed out copies of the U.S. Constitution.

Although it was reported that other groups had been passing out fliers or some other forms of literature, the Tea Party was singled out for banning. Could it have been they were providing subversive information to the public? Of course, with the latest communication from the ATF to the Federal Firearm Licensees in Tennessee, it could be construed that the U.S. Constitution is really not pertinent any longer, in the eyes of our government.

Monday, May 4, 2009

Rose Colored Glasses, Washington Style


"Wow, like dudes and dudettes, what are you smokin' in Washington????"

Seeing the world through rose colored glasses are we?


Please come visit my blog at its new home:

http://aspect.arjis.connect.com

Thanks, and see you there...
Posted by Picasa
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Cap The Credit Card Interest Rates!

U.S. House Bailout HearingImage by Public Citizen via Flickr

TARP funds are being dispursed to financial institutions today.

I just reviewed a story which addresses Washington State's proposal to pass a bill which would limit the interest rate on credit cards to 12%.

House bill aims to cap interest rates

My thoughts on the subject were expressed in my comment to the story:

It should be a FEDERAL LAW and the rate be "X" above the PRIME or lower. The law should also stipulate that only "x" amount of LATE and OVERLIMIT charges be allowed, and that after that, any unpaid balance would accrue interest at "x" above Prime.

If the government gives all this money to bailout the banks, they should pass laws to help head off the rising amounts of BANKRUPTCIES. Laws that would actually help the consumers pay their debt down, instead of allowing the banks to BURY THEM in interest and fees.


Why do we allow the banks to push the populace further in the hole? People get behind in their responsibilities, and the "swindlers" come in with their huge interest rates and continuous fees, which knocks the person further into debt, until their only option is bankruptcy.

Don't think the banks don't sell that debt to the next tier of "swindlers", for less, and then this tier adds another fee on top of the original balance. They then continually harass, attempting to collect the original amount plus the added "Collection Fee". These entities are called Collection Agencies.

The system is broke. Capitalism should not be fueled by those who would take advantage of the taxpayer, and then ask the government for a bailout.

They are effectively asking that same taxpayer to foot the bill when the banks and finance companies are "losing" money, because of their cheating business practices.

Wheww!!! I'm finished. Thanks for reading.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]