There is No Colusion Between Executive and Judicial... Right?

 Federal Court Finds Obama Appointees Interfered With New Black Panther Prosecution

Wow... Imagine that?

Obama’s DOJ had claimed Judicial Watch was not entitled to attorney’s fees since “none of the records produced in this litigation evidenced any political interference whatsoever in” how the DOJ handled the New Black Panther Party case. But United States District Court Judge Reggie Walton disagreed. Citing a “series of emails” between Obama political appointees and career Justice lawyers, Walton writes:
The documents reveal that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJ’s dismissal of claims in that case, which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General Perez’s testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision. Surely the public has an interest in documents that cast doubt on the accuracy of government officials’ representations regarding the possible politicization of agency decision-making.

Final Decision - Georgia Ballot Challenge - 2/3/2012

An ill prepared case killed the opportunity to prove if Obama is actually ineligible to hold the office of POTUS.

A wasted opportunity...

Excerpt from the full Court Ruling below:

The Court finds the testimony of the witnesses, as well as the exhibits tendered, to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support Plaintiffs' allegations.

Ms. Taitz attempted to solicit expert testimony from several of the witnesses without qualifying or tendering the witnesses as experts. See Stephens v. State, 219 Ga. App. 881 (1996) (the unqualified testimony of the witness was not competent evidence). For example, two of Plaintiffs' witnesses testified that Mr. Obama's birth certificate was forged, but neither witness was properly qualified or tendered as an expert in birth records, forged documents or document manipulation. Another witness testified that she has concluded that the social security number Mr. Obama uses is fraudulent;however, her investigatory methods and her sources of information were not properly presented, and she was never qualified or tendered as an expert in social security fraud, or fraud investigations in general. Accordingly, the Court cannot make an objective threshold determination of these witnesses' testimony without adequate knowledge of their qualifications. See Knudsen v. Duffee-Freeman, Inc., 95 Ga. App. 872 (1957) (forthe testimony of an expert witness to be received, his or her qualifications as such must
be first proved).

None of the testifying witnesses provided persuasive testimony. Moreover, theCourt finds that none of the written submissions tendered by Plaintiffs have probative value. Given the unsatisfactory evidence presented by the Plaintiffs, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs' claims are not persuasive.

SOPA stalls in the face of White House opposition

(January 16 2012) The Stop Online Piracy Act hit a wall over the weekend after The White House came out against the bill. The Hill reports on comments from house oversight chairman Darrell Issa, who was assured by majority leader Eric Cantor that more work was needed “to address outstanding concerns and work to build consensus prior to any anti-piracy legislation coming before the House for a vote.”

Shortly before that statement, SOPA sponsor chairman Lamar Smith offered to make significant concessions to the section of the bill that would require ISPs to block offending sites, but it wasn’t enough. SOPA’s Senate counterpart, the Protect IP Act, is still on the table, however.


Read More: SOPA stalls in the face of White House opposition

Same Old Politics. What Will Change?

Image via Wikipedi
I read this article on The American Thinker. It talks about the possibility that blackmail of Obama and his team will influence decisions the next four years.

Is Obama vulnerable to blackmail?

You know it sounds like an over-used, re-run, worn out phrase:

"we need to get the bums out of Washington"

But, it never seems to happen. "Our fellow Americans" don't deserve anything that they didn't earn. In this case, they don't deserve a better government, because they didn't work to weed out the corrupts, and the "corruptables" out of office. The country needs new players in the game. People who believe in what the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence were based on. Not "representatives" who are back-biting, corrupt pawns of every special interest, PAC, and criminal that can buy them.

It is my opinion Obama and his crew are not the only ones deeply connected to old time corrupt politics and politicians. We have so many entrenched "legacies" in our government who continue to push their agendas, not the peoples. That money was long ago paid, and is still there, just fueling the debates and stalemates we read about daily. Repayment for past favors...

Left, and Right... What about a moderator? What about another entity within those halls who hasn't been entrenched there and doesn't owe "favors"?

"You did it… No, you did it…" *fingers pointing both directions…

Grrrr. Business as usual DC politics… Sickening! The Republicans, the Democrats, they all have skeletons in the their closet.

The lots have been cast, the "people" have spoken, now we have to deal with the state this country is in with the current mix of politicians we put in the seats. There will be NO CHANGE, because no one is willing to change. DC needs to get over the bickering, finger pointing, selling out, and conniving. The "statesmen" need to actually work together to do the people on the street and in the workforce some good, instead of selling out to corruption and special interests.

They can go ahead and point fingers at each other, but that will never be the solution to the problem. The people need to REALLY vote change. That means up-rooting the buried alliances and corruptions that continue to influence the decisions made affecting the people and their lives.

They need to do something different: "Vote the people, not the money" This country needs a catalyst of change, not a new face on politics as usual.